What McCain-Feingold Really Means: The Campaign Finance Reform Bill is in Effect — At Least Until the Supreme Court Renders its Judgment.
Business Week (June 4, 2003)
A Candidate Turns New Money Rules to His Advantage
By Richard A. Oppel, Jr., New York Times (June 3, 2003)
Campaign-Finance Reform, Ad Nauseum
By Rob Witwer, Denver Post (May 28, 2003)
Attack-ad ban makes strange bedfellows
By Lyle Denniston, Boston Globe (May 13, 2003)
NRA Asks Rehnquist to Allow Ads
By Charles Lane, Washington Post (May 13, 2003)
Three Judges, Four Opinions, 1,638 Pages, And One Good Idea
By Stuart Taylor Jr., National Journal (May 12, 2003)
Election Law’s Sponsors Seek Stay on All of Ruling
By RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr., New York Times (May 9, 2003)
The D.C. District Court’s Recent Campaign Finance Opinions: The Fourteen-Pound Tome Underscores the Policy, As Well as Legal, Problems with the Act
By Marci Hamilton, Findlaw (May 8, 2003)
1,600 Pages of Confusion
By George F. Will, Washington Post (May 8, 2003)
Soft money ban survives, barely
San Francisco Chronicle (May 7, 2003)
An Absence of Judicial Restraint? Unusually Angry Bickering Marks Decision on Campaign Finance Law
By Neely Tucker, Washington Post (May 7, 2003)
Judges Struggle on Campaign Finance: Lower Court Delays Imperil Plan for Supreme Court Ruling by 2004 Elections
By Neely Tucker, Washington Post (April 4, 2003)